To my children, my greatest teachers.
The highly sensitive family: How to thrive in a toxic world.
The illiterate of the 21st century will not be those who cannot read and write, but those who cannot learn, unlearn and relearn – Alvin Toffler
If you are reading this, you are probably looking for information to help a child who does not “fit” in or is “out of sync”. A child who is different, a child doctors do not know how to help. You may be faced with a diagnosis of ADHD and/or autism and/or learning disability and feel that these diagnoses somehow do not correspond to what your child is experiencing because you have noticed that your child’s “out of control” behaviors and lack of attention change for the better as soon as he or she is in a “safe”, quieter environment.
If that is the case, you may likely have a child who has sensory processing sensitivities. If that is the case have hope, you are not alone. I am the parent of two children who have and still experience behavioral and emotional issues related to heightened sensory processing capacities and I when we began our journey in the world of sensory processing, I found very little help from the medical community. I turned to the Internet, and sensory processing communities for answers, and began to observe and learn from our own experiences. As a result I started a blog, entitled thehighlysensitivefamily.wordpress.com, to collect the material I found.
What Are Sensory Processing Sensitivities?
Sensory processing sensitivities refer to different responses than normal to stimuli (environmental and social). It can affect people in only one sense–for example, just touch or just sight or movement–or affect multiple senses. Sensory processing is a key characteristic not only to autism but as I found out ADHD, giftedness and many learning disabilities diagnoses.
Without implying that Autism, ADHD and other disabilities do not exist, it is important to understand that children with sensory processing sensitivities are often misdiagnosed as having ADHD or autism since their sensory overload or under-load can translate into “out of control” behaviors, attention deficits, withdrawing behaviors and difficulties engaging in social interactions and communication that are difficult to manage in a variety of social settings such as the classroom, home or new environments. But children affected by sensory processing issues behave differently because they are experiencing sensory and social stress. When the sensory stressors are removed or reduced, their behaviors change drastically.
While few of us have heard of this phenomenon, it is wide spread. In the article “Breakthrough Study Reveals Biological Basis for Sensory Processing Disorders in Kids”, it is explained that:
“ Sensory processing disorders are more prevalent in children than autism and as common as attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, yet the condition receives far less attention partly because it’s never been recognized as a distinct disease.
Children with SPD struggle with how to process stimulation, which can cause a wide range of symptoms including hypersensitivity to sound, sight and touch, poor fine motor skills and easy distractibility. Some SPD children cannot tolerate the sound of a vacuum, while others can’t hold a pencil or struggle with social interaction. Furthermore, a sound that one day is an irritant can the next day be sought out. The disease can be baffling for parents and has been a source of much controversy for clinicians, according to the researchers.”[i]
As MD Elysa Marco explains, most people don’t know how to support these kids because they don’t fall into a traditional clinical medical group:
“Sometimes they are called the ‘out of sync’ kids. Their language is good, but they seem to have trouble with just about everything else, especially emotional regulation and distraction. In the real world, they’re just less able to process information efficiently, and they get left out and bullied.”[ii]
Another difficulty is that there is always a lot of confusion surrounding sensory processing, and, as is explained in the article “Decoding Sensory Processing Disorder”, many different behaviors fall under the phrase sensory processing disorder. Some children overreact and others underreact to overwhelming stimuli. While children exhibit widely different, and sometimes opposite, characteristics, they are all classified as possessing a sensory processing disorder. This can be very confusing. [iii]
Sensory processing sensitivities are very real, as many other cultures have understood for millennia, and I suggest that they represent a distinct form of intelligence. Unfortunately, we live in a society where senses are not recognized as essential to health or to understanding our world, in a “disembodied” culture that worships the mind at the expenses of the senses, as we will explore in chapter 1. This culture has a tradition of pathologizing “difference” and as such, sensory processing sensitivities have become labeled as a disorders, topic of chapter 2. Thus most of literature on the subject refers to this phenomenon as Sensory Processing Disorder (SPD). As we will see in chapter 3, different sensory processing characteristics can correspond to behaviors often associated with Autism and/or ADHD. While the medical community does not recognize heightened sensory processing to be a phenomenon dissociated from other “disorders”, researchers are beginning to prove that sensory processing sensitivities affect an area of the brain distinct from those affected by autism and ADHD[iv].
While researchers still consider this as a disease, these sensitivities can also indicate giftedness or a “highly sensitive” personality trait. In these cases, sensory processing differences lead to forms of “over-excitability” that can be reduced when children learn to be aware of their sensitivities, to self-regulate their reaction and eventually, this can lead to lessening the need to behave in peculiar ways.
I have come to realize through my own family experiences that there is a way to help these children thrive, but it requires us to understand and address these children’s sensorial needs as positive and fundamental traits that are part of a healthy life. This is hard work and unfortunately, it means being willing to go against mainstream ideas of health.
Our own story
My journey in the world of sensory health began with the birth of my children. My first-born always refused to be cuddled. It was clear that touching was a painful experience for him. He was highly sensitive to my milk, and I had to eliminate many foods. He was a happy baby but when time came to put him into daycare, I became increasingly aware of his uniqueness. He would nurture other children who were struggling in the daycare setting, but after a few days of adjustment to this new environment, he began to have nightmares. It was clear his reactions to the stress were more intense than other children. As I was pregnant with my second child, I kept him home. The nightmares stopped immediately.
My second child was even more sensitive. He reacted not only to foods, but also to sound and environmental elements. Our lives became very stressful, having to relearn how to cook for a child who kept on reacting to most things in our environment constantly. As I went back to work, the stress level of our family increased and my child’s sensitivities increased as well.
I found myself seeking solutions and answers to the difficulties my children were facing. Yet, the medical community fell short of being able to help us. Sensory processing sensitivities are not easy to diagnosed, and often not considered to be a real condition. Our pediatrician and, my partner of the time, thought I was an overprotective mother who did not know how control her children’s behaviors in an effective way. They were reacting like the majority of society, considering that sensory processing is not a condition and that parenting is at the source of these “out of control” behaviors.
Researchers are working towards helping us understand how sensory processing affect children, I knew from our life experiences that the behaviors associated with sensory over or under load could be regulated.
I observed that my children’s “acting out” behaviors were caused by reactions to specific type of people, usually anxious, as much as to specific types of environment. They are what I now understand to be empathic. In other words, they are deeply sensitive to other people’s mood, an anxious person would make my eldest son act out of control immediately. Of course my anxieties made him react too.
During a medical checkup, my son’s out of control behavior intrigued the doctor who decided we should get him evaluated for autism. So I did. The team who evaluated him had a hard time deciding on a diagnostic, as his issues were very slight, but they did in the end evaluate him as having the Asperger syndrome. As suggested by the evaluation team, I also got diagnosed and eventually labeled as also having Asperger tendencies. Through this process, the psychologist who diagnosed me introduced me to the Highly Sensitive Person personality trait and it immediately resonated with issues we were facing.
What is a Highly Sensitive Person?
According to Wikipedia: “ A highly sensitive person (HSP) is a person having the innate trait of high sensory processing sensitivity (or innate sensitiveness as Carl Jung originally coined it[v],[vi]). According to Elaine N. Aron and colleagues as well as other researchers, highly sensitive people, who comprise about a fifth of the population (equal numbers in men and women), may process sensory data much more deeply and thoroughly due to a biological difference in their nervous systems.[vii] This is a specific trait, with key consequences for how we view people, that in the past has often been confused with innate shyness, social anxiety problems, inhibitedness, social phobia and innate fearfulness,[viii],[ix] and introversion.[x] (…) Although the term is primarily used to describe humans, something similar to the trait is present in over 100 other species.”[xi],[xii]
According to blogger Victoria Erikson, highly sensitive people sense life deeper than others. They are emotional chameleons who soak up other people’s moods and desires like sponges. They are deeply alive, experience sensations vividly and are moved to tears by the beauty in simple thing: the beauty of a flower, a subtle shift in the environment, the riff of a song, a scent, a taste, etc.
Of course, all are fragile, but highly sensitive people are more easily stimulated. As blogger Victoria Erikson, a highly sensitive person, explains, highly sensitive people:
“have the ability to see colors and feel energy the way others hear jet planes. The world takes on a rich tapestry of immense gorgeousness at almost every turn, which then fuels your imagination and makes you spin with aliveness. And aliveness is a grand thing.
“Aliveness is energy. It’s the juice, the vitality, and the passion that wakes up our cells every morning. It’s what makes us want to dance. It’s the energy that moves a relationship from the status quo to something grander and much more expansive, something that makes our hearts beat faster, our minds and our eyes open wider, than ever before. Everything is of interest to a person who is truly alive, whether it’s a challenge, a loving moment, a bucket of grief, or a glimpse of beauty.” ~ Daphne Rose Kingma
Yet, it also means that much like the spirited and hot blooded Arabians in the horse world, your alertness and reactivity may easily cause you to shy away with fright at things that shouldn’t be so scary.
Since your nervous system responds so easily to stimuli, that it can often times be overwhelming and exhausting to be so flooded with sensation—which makes you prone to bolting from uncomfortable situations, relationships, and jobs.
And sometimes your sensitivity makes life extraordinarily painful, and you want to shut down and hide your raw self from the loud chaos that accompanies this earth’s continual rotation.
Continually swimming in an endless sea of sensation can at times be exhausting, regardless if it’s beautifully terrible or terribly beautiful, and this is why your deep-rooted need for peace and self care is essential to support your superb sensitivity. ”[xiii]
Deciding to understand sensory processing issues from this perspective allows for an optimistic approach to helping children. It allows seeing them as people with special gifts that need to be nurtured instead of oppressed.
Hope is a Toxic World
The discovery of this highly sensitive trait changed our lives. It helped me to understand that heightened sensory processing is not necessarily a disorder but that some of us possess a deep sensory sensitivity, a gift that should be fostered, not eliminated, since it helps us perceive the world in much more nuanced details than most. I began to research the world of sensory processing and HSPs. I decided not to ignore or “cure” our sensitivity but to celebrate them and to help my children develop these incredible qualities to their fullest.
As the HSP researcher Dr. Elaine Aron mentions in her book “the highly sensitive child”[xiv], parenting a Highly Sensitive Children (HSC) brings many joys. My children do deeply appreciate me, they have made me much more aware of many things and making me see and question life in new ways. We connect on very deep levels. Their empathy and reaction to me have forced me to be much more aware of myself and to find the way to heal myself of many toxic ways in order to help them find inner peace.
As a parent I have had to learn that their discomfort in our man-made world is normal and that my role is to help them discover how to integrate in social settings while respecting their uniqueness and differences. According to the blog, HSP Health, their sensory processing sensitivities mean that often HSC get the sense at a young age that they are different. They don’t fit in. They are not motivated in the same way. This profound sense of being different is not temporary. It does not go away, and can cause pain when the sensitive’s differentness is treated negatively by family, peers, and early authority figures.
The HSP Health blog provides a list of reasons, as to why the highly sensitive person will get the message that they are different, which resonates with my family. Amongst them, are many sensory related issues:
- Physical sensitivities like loud sounds, too much noise, light and tactile or touch sensitivity may cause discomfort or pain, which is not necessarily true of non-HSP’s.
- A highly sensitive person often needs time to themselves to rest after interacting with others. Non-HSP’s often recharge with other people.
- Social interaction can be draining unless it is for a short time, with a few people in a quiet setting. Non-HSP’s are more comfortable with big noisy social engagements.
- The highly sensitive person hates small talk, something that non-HSP’s thrive on competition and the highly sensitive person are like oil and water. Non-HSP’s are more comfortable with competition.
- Highly sensitive people are sensitive to the feelings of others and have a tendency to absorb the feelings of others causing much discomfort and unhappiness.
- HSP’s are known for their empathy. Empathy in sensitives is more than a feeling for others – it is an active way of knowing the world.
- HSP’s often feel a deep connection with nature and all the creatures in it.
- Highly sensitive people can be deeply spiritual.
- Many HSP’s will have physical conditions and allergies of one form or another.
- HSP’s can form deep bonds with animals.
- Harm and abuse of all kinds are harder for highly sensitive people to heal.
The differences between highly sensitive people, and the rest of the population, are much more than skin deep. The deep sensing that HSP experience means that they define their senses of self differently and as a consequence think differently.
Seeing my children from this lens made me realize that their future depends on them becoming self-aware of these specificities and being able to self-regulate their own reaction without fear or feeling somehow inadequate. I began to understand that in order to help them become healthy and active participants in the world, I needed to guide them in a process of sensorial self-discovery, leading by example.
For my children to thrive, I had to accept that life must be handled differently. Yet, I did not have the knowledge or the tools to help my children. I chose to undertake a process of deep change, in the process deciding to de-learn many things I had been taught about emotional, empathy, social, chemical, sensorial, physical, intellectual ways of being.
I began a slow process of change in my life that incorporated sensory processing in my health. Slowly, as I nourished my own sensitivities, instead of trying to “overcome them”, I began to experience the world very differently. It is crucial to help our children become who they are, when we ignore these gifts and consider them as part of a disease, we are condemning them to a life of mental ills that could be avoided.
Part of the nurturing of children’s senses is to become aware of what can be toxic to them. When I began this journey, it was very difficult to find relevant information and help when dealing with how to ease symptoms caused by high level of toxicity, how to help a child (or adult) heal when traditional medicine is not an option, understanding the hidden codes of sensory languages, helping children decode their moods and sensory signals, and learning to use them to their advantage instead of being overwhelmed by them.
The first step for me has been to learn how to deeply listen to myself and to my children. I also had to learn to act and react from a place of deep understanding, compassion and empathy.
DIY HSP Well-Being
Unfortunately information on the subject was limited to a few books so I began to search the Internet for all material that seemed related to sensory processing and HSP health. This is where my professional training became very useful. As a university researcher, I had been studying the use of digital technology by young children for some time and one thing became very evident to me.
I have been part of a group of Ryerson new media researchers[xv] involved in the creation of a new research lab called EDGE. EDGE (Experience Design and Gaming Environments)[xvi]lab research projects focus on the studying, fostering and/or developing new media practices such as serious gaming, trans-media, adaptive design and socio-economic designs.
EDGE researchers explore the aesthetics of current “making” culture and peer-to-peer culture. My own research focuses on studying and developing informal-learning communal practices that promote self-determination and the physical autonomy of marginalized individuals and communities in order to enhance social integration.
What we noticed is that objects all have a bias implied in their design, which often isolates individuals from other potential aspects of social life. Institutional aesthetics such as those of the medical community or other “expert” communities often disregard the experience (sensorial, social, mental and/or physical) that these objects create in their users. Within a new media perspective, this experience has to become key, which implies a co-design approach that involves the user community as much as the “expert” in the creation of artifacts.
In recent years, I have witnessed mesmerizing new realities made possible by new media co-designs such as the emergent digital lives of people normally marginalized, if not oppressed, by dominant communication infrastructures. Much self-determination has developed in virtual worlds: Paraplegics dancing, people meeting virtually and marrying in real life, autistic children expressing themselves with ease, physically disabled children learning about the body through gaming, communities of people helping each other cope with depression and cancer by creating art and spaces to share experiences, poor communities developing sustainable economies and virtual protesters influencing governments’ decision making. Key to all these activities has been an incredible sense of community where people share experiences, care and help each other in order to enhance their social lives. In the physical world, I have witnessed a little girl called Zoe become an active social actor in Ryerson’s Early Learning Centre through the use of a cardboard chair build for her. The thing is, Zoe cannot move easily, nor can she talk. She had to sit in a baby chair with a caregiver constantly by her side. The semantics of this experience were tacitly excluding her from the possibility of a social life with the other children. By acquiring some physical independence from her caregiver, she became a peer and began to be integrated in other children’s social lives. Her chair is a new media object, through which Zoe acquired a new social dimension.
Digital Native Learning
As a socio-economic focused on studying the changes brought by new media to our social lives, I understood networks as a space of knowledge production that could give me and my children access to informal communities of interest and practices focused on similar issues. In my mind, the internet has a become a sort of “Living library” where peers share their lived experiences and knowledge, potentially giving each other new perspective and ideas to apply to their own context. I knew that the emerging digital learners are going to have drastically different learning needs than analog children.
For one, they have or are learning to find what they want in terms of information and content, when they need it. Their learning is out of the classroom for many things such as dancing, media making, etc.
Secondly, their social world is rapidly becoming embedded in mobile technologies. They exist in hybrid spaces where the distinction between space social/ institutional /personal boundaries are being eroded. They learn and live in real time. Their notion of is going to be radically different and a lot more based on a hybrid between virtual and physical space and time continuum.
Thirdly, their future success will be defined less in terms of a competitive edge and educational degrees but much more in terms of diy survival abilities defined by varying sustainable, local, cultural needs as well as appropriate solutions to problems, that we as adults can barely imagine, let alone prepare them for, if our teaching methods and our approaches to what learning is don’t change.
Our global crisis will not go away and my dream is that the solutions out of self-destruction will be in new cultural, economy and social frameworks that nurture life in all its forms instead of abusing power. As a European who grew up in an Atheist home and a catholic country, the only models to education and life I have been exposed and conditioned to are lacking traditional (as in indigenous wisdom) understanding. Europe has no natural world left, it is all man remade, so are all the belief systems.
Changing our Sensory Context
I decided to take my children for half a year to a small fishing village in Nicaragua. During this time, I de-schooled them. This experiment was meant to help me learn how to listen and them how to trust and speak from their deep inner space.
I did this to change our social context in order to learn to listen differently: to ourselves, each other and another culture, change the dynamics of teacher/students and child/parent relationship by putting me and kids on the same knowledge level, language and skill wise, to force a new collaborative dynamic and to build a culture based on trust, respect and understanding of each others and the rest of the community. We all have something to contribute and want to learn.
By deschooling the kids, I chose to try to build our own reality and integrate our dreams in real life. In his book deschooling Society, Ivan Illich discussed a time when society would be de-schooled. I believe we are in the early adoption phase of a digital DIY culture which is rapidly growing across middle class worldwide and that will lead to part of our population to choose de-schooling.
This book is the result of this journey and exploration. Exploring the important of deschooled node of learning, where learning is based on authentic need, in helping children build healthy, meaningful lives.
I hope this will be useful to others who are going through a similar process, having decided to rebuild and move forward trying to create sustainable lives both physically, mentally, environmentally, socially and economically, instead of destroying what makes them and their children unique.
What began as a literature review on media and autism morphed into research on sensory processing and highly sensitive people (HSP). The results of this work have initiated the writing of this book. This book is difficult for me to explain as it is both influenced by previous work with Dr. Jason Nolan on children and their use of media and by my own interest in sensory processing and HSP, which emerged out of issues my family has been facing.
The highly sensitive family: how to thrive in a toxic world
As the parent of two children with special needs, I was very aware of the real challenges posed by sensory processing issues and it became clear that this is an area of investigation that needs to be explored, for parents, by parents. It is clear to me that we need to develop sensory processing literacy for both children and adults, and that digital media can help.
Part of the nurturing of children’s senses is to become aware of what can be toxic to them. When I began this work, it was very difficult to find relevant information and help when dealing with how to ease symptoms caused by high level of toxicity, how to help a child (or adult) heal with traditional medicine is not an option, understanding the hidden codes of sensory languages, helping children decode their moods as tied to food sensitivities and reaction as much as to other people’s feelings, helping them to filter the negative energies and absorb the positives, learning to “sense” and use it to their advantage instead of being overwhelmed by it.
Key to helping children with sensory processing issues is also understanding media as a way for them to learn about social life without sensory overload, again going against a majority of literature on the use of media with children which is often negative.
I began to create an auto-ethnographic framework around sensory processing and the potential use of digital media in sensory processing literacy as well as an alternate learning tool for children who cannot cope with the classroom and have problems with self-regulation.
This book represents a continuation of my research on digital natives but now focused on sensory health. It is based on the premise that we live in a new media society. New media represents practices where individuals appropriate standards technologies to their own multiple social/cultural domains. New media began as an approach to media making based on problem solving, tinkering, experimenting and thinking on the margins of the norms, which has now infiltrated many of out social and cultural processes. I hypothesize that we are entering new media society where the public uses social media and soon 3d printing to learn and experiment with alternate forms of social and cultural lives. A second hypothesis is that these changes affect all areas of life, and that we are entering an era of DIY health and health hackers. Both the body and health are now new media fields of enquiry and redefinition and slowly, sensory health is becoming a new media.
The book is structured around four distinct parts.
Part 1: 21st century new media society: The senses as new media
The first part of this book, retraces the historical and conceptual framework of sensorial health in our society. In this section we retrace the body, space and nature have been colonized via many of our cultural meta-narratives. This in order to understand and outline some of the fundamental problems facing people with heightened sensory perception and why their capacities have been understood as illnesses instead of strengths. As seen in the field of disabilities, via informal networks, the dominant culture of disembodied selves is being redefined by the public. Activist communities are reclaiming their uniqueness and beginning to distribute messages of hope by reversing the negative into positive approaches to their needs. Children are growing up with these new narratives as well as with direct access to research that can be used to redefine health.
Part 2: Sensorial Health
The second part focuses on environmental, social and cultural issues that influence our senses and also explores alternate health models that include the senses in their definition of health. This section ends with a redefinition of health that includes space and social life as a fundamental element to well-being.
Part 3: alternative sensory diet
This section examines ways to help children cope with sensory over or under-load by using not just traditional health solutions but also incorporating 21st century technologies.
Sensory over or underload produces behaviors that seen out of synch with the rest of society. These children are simply coping with extra or painful energy generated by their senses that must exist their bodies. This energy is the life force that Rousseau considered need to be tamed. Yet, in this context, intense emotions and reactions are an important part of deeper understanding of our humanity. They are the source of extraordinary performances and insights, those of our most brilliant artists, inventors, thinkers and spiritual leaders.
While westerners look upon intensity and its behaviors as impolite and a sign of disrespect, denying it just pushes inward this natural intensity and eventually it will damage a person. The key is not to eliminate this intensity but to learn to work with it. To be aware of what we are trying to say to ourselves through our intense reactions. The intensity is a message that we cannot ignore what is going on and also a sign of strength and powerful energy.
Part 4: sensory literacy
The final section of the book, explores how heightened sensory processing abilities translate into an alternate form of intelligence that a different approach to learning. Given how unique each individuals’ heightened sensory processing abilities are, fostering these gifts requires a different approach to learning. It is not something that can be taught in school and often, the act of evaluation will eliminate in children the desire for self-determination.
As we will see, self-regulation and self-awareness are essential to developing sensory well being, and as such, it is important to develop a DIY informal forms of sensory pedagogy that fosters in children the construction of strategies towards self-determination and autonomous, self-regulated health Practices.
To conclude, we will examine how virtual informal learning can be used to create informal DIY sensory health community centers that focused on sensory health and literacy via informal learning.
This book is a work in progress but I decided to post the work prior to publishing as I know that some of the information it includes may be helpful to parents struggling to make sense of what is happening to their children. Stay tune, as chapters are finalizing, I will continue to post them on this blog. Please provide me feedback, if you can.
[i] Bunim, Juliana (2013). Breakthrough Study Reveals Biological Basis for Sensory Processing Disorders in Kids, University of California San Francisco, https://www.ucsf.edu/news/2013/07/107316/breakthrough-study-reveals-biological-basis-sensory-processing-disorders-kidsi
[ii] Bunim, Juliana (2013). Breakthrough Study Reveals Biological Basis for Sensory Processing Disorders in Kids, University of California San Francisco, https://www.ucsf.edu/news/2013/07/107316/breakthrough-study-reveals-biological-basis-sensory-processing-disorders-kidsi
[iv] Bunim, Juliana (2013). Breakthrough Study Reveals Biological Basis for Sensory Processing Disorders in Kids, University of California San Francisco, https://www.ucsf.edu/news/2013/07/107316/breakthrough-study-reveals-biological-basis-sensory-processing-disorders-kidsi
[v] Jung, C. (1913). ‘The theory of psychoanalysis’. CW 4. And JUNG, C (1916). ‘Psychoanalysis and neurosis’. CW 4.
[vi] Aron, E.N. (2006). “The Clinical Implications of Jungs Concept of Sensitiveness”. Journal of Jungian Theory and Practice 8: 11–43.
[vii] Ketay, S., Hedden, T., Aron, A., Aron, E., Markus, H., & Gabrieli, G. (2007, January). The personality/temperament trait of high sensitivity: fMRI evidence for independence of cultural context in attentional processing. Poster presented at the annual meeting of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Memphis, TN. Summary by Aron (2006): “A functional study comparing brain activation in Asians recently arrived in the United States to European-Americans found that in the nonsensitive, different areas were activated according to culture during a difficult discrimination task known to be affected by culture, but culture had no impact on the activated areas for highly sensitive subjects, as if they were able to view the stimuli without cultural influence.”
[viii] Brodt, S.; Zimbardo, P. (1981). “Modifying Shyness-Related Social Behavior Through Symptom Misattribution”. Journal of Personality and Society Psychology 41 (3): 437–49. doi:10.1037/0022-35188.8.131.527
[ix] Kagan, J. 1994 Galen’s prophecy. New York: Basic Books.
[x] Aron, Elaine and Aron, Arthur. 1997. Sensory-Processing Sensitivity and its Relation to Introversion and Emotionality, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. Aug. 1997 Vol. 73, No. 2, pp. 345–368. (WebCite archive).
[xi] Wolf, M., Van Doorn, S., & Weissing, F. J. (2008). Evolutionary emergence of responsive and unresponsive personalities. PNAS, 105(41), 15825-15830.
[xii] While many animals are sensitive to specific stimuli, it seems that others demonstrate a broader sensitivity, plasticity, or flexibility. For example, Sih and Bell (2008) wrote that enough examples exist “to suggest that individual difference in environmental and social sensitivity is common, potentially quite important, and worthy of further study” (p. 16). Dingemanse and colleagues (2009) provide an integrative model for observing personality traits (e.g., shy, bold, aggressive, nonaggressive) that in some species or individuals are inflexible and completely specific to context but in other cases are flexible, occurring in some contexts and not in others, according to its usefulness, so that the underlying trait in these cases would be being sensitive enough to know when to be sensitive—suggesting layers of processing.
[xiv] Aron, Elaine, N. (2002). The highly sensitive child. Harmony
[xvi] The EDGE Lab is funded by the Canadian Foundation for Innovation and the Ontario Ministry of Research and Innovation. Research projects in the lab are funded by: SSHRC, MITACS, The School of Early Childhood Education’s SRC Committee, Bell Broadcast and New Media Fund, the OCE Interact program, NCE and GRAND.